California courts are known for performing all sorts of legal contortions in order to perpetuate the state’s complex and extensive regulation of guns and how they can be owned and carried. In a recent example a “liberal” federal judge decided that past racism should be legitimized so that today’s minorities can be protected by laws that were rooted in…racism.
The opinion came in the case of Baird v. Bonta, which challenges California’s open carry licensing laws.
California courts are known for performing all sorts of legal contortions in order to perpetuate the state’s complex and extensive regulation of guns and how they can be owned and carried. In a recent example a “liberal” federal judge decided that past racism should be legitimized so that today’s minorities can be protected by laws that were rooted in…racism.
The opinion came in the case of Baird v. Bonta, which challenges California’s open carry licensing laws.
